[Homeroast] OT: Re: Mailing List hacks
wascher at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 21:10:19 CDT 2012
They'd never do it. SPAM filters aren't good enough, so some of the
responses would be sent to legitimate users.
Only 2 things would slow it: educate users (you'll find a significant
portion of your users are unteachable, and people do make mistakes too); or
change the internet to provide positive credentials for every user &
traceability (this available but not widely implemented & many do not want
it to be).
“Greetings, my friend. We are all interested in the future, for that is
where you and I are going to spend the rest of our lives. And remember my
friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future.” --
Criswell, Plan 9 from Outer Space
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Martin Maney <maney at two14.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:12:56PM -0700, Ira wrote:
> > I believe you're wrong. The email addresses I have that I've never
> > responded to spam with tend not to get spam.
> I never said you had to reply from a valuable email address...
> It was just a neat thought experiment, though it could actually happen
> if the big email providers and ISPs could be convinced to generate
> suitably sincere fake replies to some percentage of the spam. Think of
> it as a DOS targeting the spammers instead of everyone else for a
> change. Or don't.
> If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
> exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
> idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps
> it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into
> the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess
> himself of it. -- Thomas Jefferson
> Homeroast mailing list
> Homeroast at lists.sweetmariascoffee.com
> <a href="http://www.sweetmariascoffee.com/forum/">Sweet Maria's Forum</a>
> <a href="http://www.sweetmarias.com/library">Our new Coffee Library</a>
More information about the Homeroast