[Homeroast] OT Test - input wanted

John Nanci john at chocolatealchemy.com
Fri Dec 24 12:26:05 CST 2010

Beating a dead horse, I know.  Yeah, looks like gmail is 'helping' me 
with this 'feature' that can't be turned off.  I really hate that and 
apparently lots of others do too.

Trying to bcc myself.  Too big brotherish for my taste.


Happy holidays everyone.

At 03:17 PM 12/13/2010, Yakster wrote:
>A little more detail on this can be found here:
>Basically, GMail is following the RFC5322 standard literally and treating
>the reply from a mailing list that has the same Message-ID as the item in
>it's sent folder as a duplicate and not showing it.  If the mailing list
>changes the Message-ID when it is sent out, then you'd be able to see the
>copy being sent and verify that your message went out to the list.  If not,
>all you'll see is the copy that you sent, which in some cases is added to
>the message thread, without knowing if it was actually sent out to the list
>or not.
> From RFC5322:
>The "Message-ID:" field provides a unique message identifier that refers to
> > a particular version of a particular message.  The uniqueness of 
> the message
> > identifier is guaranteed by the host that generates it (see below).  This
> > message identifier is intended to be machine readable and not necessarily
> > meaningful to humans.  A message identifier pertains to exactly one version
> > of a particular message; subsequent revisions to the message each receive
> > new message identifiers.
> >
>Note: There are many instances when messages are "changed", but those
> > changes do not constitute a new instantiation of that message, 
> and therefore
> > the message would not get a new message identifier.  For example, when
> > messages are introduced into the transport system, they are often prepended
> > with additional header fields such as trace fields (described in section
> > 3.6.7) and resent fields (described in section 3.6.6).  The 
> addition of such
> > header fields does not change the identity of the message and therefore the
> > original "Message-ID:" field is retained.  In all cases, it is the meaning
> > that the sender of the message wishes to convey (i.e., whether this is the
> > same message or a different message) that determines whether or not the
> > "Message-ID:" field changes, not any particular syntactic difference that
> > appears (or does not appear) in the message.
> >
>This is frustrating, and I've considered the suggestion of subscribing from
>a second email address to see that my messages made it out, but so far it
>seems like most of my messages have made it through.
>Homeroast mailing list
>Homeroast at lists.sweetmariascoffee.com
>Homeroast community pictures -upload yours!) : 

More information about the Homeroast mailing list